Select Page

Wrongful Imprisonment

 

The terms “false imprisonment”, “wrongful imprisonment” and “unlawful detention” are often used interchangeably. Below are some frequently asked questions in relation to these terms.

What is wrongful imprisonment?

The crux of a person’s claim for False Imprisonment “is the imposition of unlawful restraint upon another’s freedom of movement.” Lucas v. J.C. Penney Co., 233 OR 345, 353; 378 P2d 717 (1963). In Christ v. McDonald, 152 Or 495, 52 P2d 655 (1936), the Court defined the elements of false imprisonment:

1. The detention and restraint on the freedom of movement of the person; and

2. The unlawfulness of the detention or restraint.

In Roberts v. Coleman, 228 Or 286, 365 P2d 79, (12961), the court ruled that the confinement may be accomplished by:

1. Actual or apparent physical barriers;

2. Compulsive physical force;

3. A threat to apply physical force; and/or

4. The assertion of legal authority.

Can someone other than a police officer be found civilly liable for a wrongful  imprisonment claim?

Yes. If someone kidnaps you and locks you in a dungeon, they have not only committed a crime, but they can be liable in a civil suit for false imprisonment. If someone refuses to let you leave a room using physical force, they have wrongfully imprisoned you.

Can a police officer be found civilly liable for false imprisonment but not wrongful arrest?

Yes. Let me give an example:

This often happens in the context of DUII allegations. Sometimes a person won’t pass the field sobriety tests and the officer suspects drugs and makes an arrest based upon probable cause. However, once the person is tested for drugs and/or alcohol, none are found. In these sorts of situations, a person should be immediately released. It isn’t right to keep the person falsely imprisoned once it is established the person was not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, but merely sick or injured.

Disclaimer:

Any legal information on this site is not necessarily updated in a timely manner; neither is it a substitute for a legal analysis in relation to your case. I do not represent you and I am not your lawyer unless you have a fee agreement with me.